patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Tension Sparks Among D159 School Board Candidates Due to Campaign Literature

School board candidates Stacy Cesta and Anna Briscoe say they have been targeted by incumbent Mark Franceschini and his running mate Bob Swale.

 

Mokena School District 159 Board of Education candidate Stacy Cesta addressed concerns that fellow candidates distributed literature attacking her campaign platform during the public comment portion of the school board’s Feb. 20 meeting.

“It saddens me that there’s already negative stuff,” Cesta told the board.

Cesta was referring to a campaign brochure for candidate team Mark Franceschini, an incumbent, and Bob Swale, who are running for two of the four school board seats opening up in April.

The literature was distributed as part of Franceschini and Swale's door-to-door canvassing efforts and states that a vote for Cesta or for candidate Anna Briscoe is a vote for “‘Yes’ on increase taxes.” Of candidate Jim Andresen, the brochure says “More spending = deficit.”

Franceschini and Swale told Patch that the brochures were designed to bring a discussion of taxes to the forefront. The candidate team said they are concerned that Cesta and Briscoe will formulate a referendum campaign if they are elected, because they lobbied in favor of the district referendum in 2011.

“We believe that we need to bring the issues up,” said Swale.

Briscoe told Patch that the campaign literature is inaccurate and that she and Cesta were targeted by Franceshini and Swale. Cesta said that she has not yet officially published a candidate platform.

“I don’t need anybody bashing me,” said Briscoe. “This is about the children of our school district and our community.”

The portion of the brochure about which Briscoe and Cesta are concerned is formatted to resemble an election ballot. However, candidates Jeff Regan, an incumbent, and Danielle Didrickson are not included on the brochure ballot and the names of Cesta, Briscoe and Andresen are spelled incorrectly.

Swale told Patch that the decision to include specific candidates and not others was based on space allotment and his and Franceschini’s knowledge of candidate opinions surrounding the referendum issue. He said that there was no specific reason for the misspellings.

Get news alerts and Facebook updates from these Lincoln-Way Patch sites:

Related Topics: Anna Briscoe, Bob Swale, Mark Franceschini, Mokena School Board Election Campaign Literature, and Stacy Cesta

Brian

7:48 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

Spelling errors on a brochure for school board? Awesome - I do like the slogan though, No New Tackses.

Reply

R.W.Voter

8:03 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

Please no new taxes and forget this referendum idea, it failed in the last few years and the student population and the number of younger home owners has dropped here because of taxes. Ask people trying to sell their homes. One of the biggest negatives about Mokena is the taxes. Thank you.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack

11:05 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

Are you a realtor? I'm sure the are other factor's than taxes. Everywhere is slow on housing. Except Texas, Tennessee, Mississippi, New Mexico....... See where I'm going with this. Gotcha Buddy!

Mad at Dad

8:06 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

Sad that these candidates feel so threatened they need to resort to their old tricks. Cesta, Briscoe and Andresen you have my vote. Franceschini, find better use of your time during your current board position.

Reply

R.W.Voter

8:46 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

Met one candidate, he can't believe that a referendum hasn't passed in years. It wasn't Franceschini or Swale. I guess he did't realize that they raised our taxes with the levy much more than they would have received with the referendum. I will vote for those I have mentioned by name. I really don't want another referendum. Thank you.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack

11:14 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

Anyone else think R-Dub is the character behind Dana Carvey's Grumpy Old Man from Saturday Night Live? Your killin me Buddy!!!!
The Levy he says. Wait for it. You wont see it coming but when it break's your screwed. At least with the referendum you know what ya got. Ya may not like it but solid and flat.

Comment_arrow

R.W.Voter

11:40 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

Maybe you don't get it Jack
When you get the referendum, that is on top of the levy, maybe you went to public school too

Aardvark

9:54 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

“This is about the children of our school district and our community.”

She is right, it is about the children. The same children that were to lose their extracurricular activities and programs due to the mismanagement of Perry and her rubber stamp school board? Look at the old Patch article that was linked up there and look at the comments. A $2.7M deficit they said. "How are Markham and Ford going to fix that?" they said, And now today, all the programs are back albeit with some higher fees, but there seems to be an emphasis to lower them http://mokena.patch.com/articles/d159-board-discusses-fee-reductions when the district gets in better financial shape.

The proof is in the pudding here. The pro-referendum people told us that there was no other way out - taxes had to be raised or the schools and the children would suffer. Now it is evident that they were either totally wrong or we weren't told the whole truth. In either case should ardent supporters of the past referendums be elected? They must be dupes because their past positions and the current status of the district's finances show that they were/are on the wrong side of history here. Are we to trust them with four years on the board if the school administrators so easily misled them?

Reply

Jimshoe

9:56 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

I am confused! Cesta Briscoe according to articles in this paper and others “worked hard to pass a TAX INCREASE REFERENDUM”. Candidates Swale and Franceschini inform voters of their position and how it is different from the others. NOW you call it NEGATIVE STUFF?

Did I miss something, those two candidates fought to pass a referendum, they must have thought and still do think that is POSITIVE STUFF. Now IT’S NEGATIVE STUFF? Which is it? I am confused!

Cesta Briscoe and the other guy have pushed, worked, pleaded for a TAX increase REFERENDUM and Swale / Franceschini say NO TO TAX REFERENDUMS.
I don’t get the complaint. Are they saying NOW they are NOT for Increasing Taxes? Which is it? Or rather and most likely prefer not every voter understand they believe in TAXES. Enrollment is down TAXES are UP and now it is wrong to state where candidates stand?

NO MORE TAXES, WILL the REAL TAX REFERENDUM CANDIDATES please stand up? I'd like to help you out, which way did you come in?

Reply

A Mom Who Cares

10:32 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

I find it embarassing that a current board member and board member candidate misspelled three of their fellow candidate's names. This is a SCHOOL board. As far as Jimshoe- the "attack" is that only 3 fellow candidates were included on their literature and not the entire five candidates. As far as RW Voter- you mentioned in a post for another article that your grandkids misspelled Merry Christmas wrong and blamed public schools. Well what do you have to say for these two fellows (Swale and Fran) who misspelled THREE names wrong on literature meant to support them. They either did it intentionally which would stem from some bad motive or it was unintentional in which case they appear as uneducated adults who do not proofread their own literature. Sounds very much like things that Markham did/does. Hey- maybe he did the literature for them since they seem to not want to talk to other candidates and voting citizens about where they stand without Markham at their side.

Reply
Comment_arrow

R.W.Voter

10:44 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

Maybe they were victims of a public school education by union teachers. I don't believe modern teachers care about spelling and cursive writing, unless they can use it to their advantage. Check the Southtown Star's April 13,2011 article and it clearly states that Anna Briscoe and Stacy Cesta worked hard for the referendum of higher taxes to support the bloated school system, and they lost. Now they want to stack the Board with pro referendum candidates and I believe that most of the citizens of this village do not want their taxes raised any higher. I believe Mark and Mr. Swale will hold the line on taxes and that is what I want. Thank you

Comment_arrow

Jack

11:21 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

R-Dub, That Doesn't make any sense. "Teacher don't care about spelling and writing." I think that is the cornerstone of COMMUNICATION.
I'm sure back in the stone age you didn't like fire but used to your advantage and now think it's pretty good thing. Keep going Buddy!!!!

Jack

10:58 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

Don't let these two clown's (Fail and Francheatme) fool you. I can play the I don't know how that misspelling game happen too. It's dirty and childish coming from a small respected community. If they are not above running an honest race based on their own beliefs and feel the need to tear down other's, well they obviously have no idea's of their own. Ask Pat, He'll tell you what they think. Dance puppet's Dance!!!
And R-Dub, with the snow I'm sure the south is looking better. I kid, I like you. But seriously think about it, no state taxes, communities without school's, nice climate, I didn't get a private education like you but even I can tell that's a good deal.

Reply
Comment_arrow

R.W.Voter

11:42 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

Well Jack, show me a house that is selling in this village at a decent price. There isn't any because the taxes are too high and the home values are too low. Public school doesn't teach that, it takes a teacher with a Masters to know that.

Comment_arrow

R.W.Voter

11:54 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

I feel that Mark and Bob are running a totally honest campaign, they are telling you right up front what they are for and what their opponents are for. Thats politics. Thank you.

Comment_arrow

Jack

1:08 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

R-Dub, honest campaign based on what? Their flyer was pretty damning and there was plenty of room to post Regan and Didrickson name, so that's a lie. I don't care for people like that. It look's foolish. And other than saying no taxes, do they talk about how they will improve the education and help he school administrators provide the best for my kid's. NO. And why? because they don't have background in education or understand what these kids need. Let's all remember what a school board does. It help the teachers and administrators do their job's by taking their input on budgeting. Not over stepping their bounds to run a school their way when they don't have a background in education. LIKE making a decision on hiring a school superintendent by the applicants who apply. NOT wasting $17,000 on an outside firm to do it for them. That's lazy. That's something they could and should do. I don't tell my accountant how to do his job because that's what he was trained and educated to do. So why does this board feel the need to tell the administrators and teachers how to do their's. If I wanted to buy steroid's I go ask PAT. Gotta ask the people who know. Just sayin, provide some reasons to back people other than I FEEL they run a honest campaign. When I talk to people they better KNOW they do.

A Mom Who Cares

11:51 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

RDub-Are there houses selling in any other villages? This problem exists in every town in the USA not just Mokena and not just because of our taxes. Actually, people moved here to get a quality education and chose Mokena because it has the lowest tax rate compared to the other LW-feeder school towns. Which is why we need to keep our school quality up if we want our house values to be competitive to other areas. I don't think larger classroom sizes compared to other surrounding schools, outdated (12 yr old) textbooks put us on the map either. Add poor morale and lack of support from people like you and our town is not looking too optimal for young families. Also, at least your generation is getting social security which the younger generation who has kids in school districts are paying for. Which I had a choice in that!!! By the way- your welcom.

Reply
Comment_arrow

R.W.Voter

11:59 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

My parents and my wife and her parents and I have thrown money into the public education pit for a long time and never used any of it. I don't like wasting money, the products of the school system except for a few children who do well are far below average. That is why they put pictures on cash registers and tell the cashier how much change to give the customer. Because most of them should have failed and didn't. That what happens when the teachers are more interested in their contract than their profession. Thank you

Comment_arrow

Jack

12:11 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Well Said MOM. R-Dub you need to come out of your bomb shelter. Show me a house selling for a decent price anywhere around here. Like I said go South. You still don't get it and will never get it. Your selfishness and checking out of society clouds your judgement and are willing to throw our children's future under the bus. I enjoy our banter and know you will never change your mind. If you could give any other explanation other than the me, me, me, me I don't want pay for nothing then I might give you a second thought, but you can't. I feel sorry for you and other's in this economy. It suck's. But many are still living beyond their means and are unwilling to downgrade. I don't know your situation but I hope you the best Buddy.

Comment_arrow

Anna Schier

11:38 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Jack and R.W. Voter,

Comments that include offensive or derogatory terms are in violation of Patch's terms of use and will be deleted.

Thank you for reading,
Anna

A Mom Who Cares

12:31 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

So, assuming the teachers are more interested in their contract than their profession which you imply is a bad thing- how does that differ from you worrying about YOUR taxes and wasting YOUR money and you with the me, me, me attitutde? Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? Note- I don't think teachers are more interested in their contract than their profession, I was just trying to present your own argument.

Reply

Aardvark

1:24 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

So 'Jack' and 'A Mom Who Cares' you say:

- People who are against tax increases are selfish and should be glad to pay more.
- That our older citizens should move south instead of living in their current community
- You make personal attacks against people you do not know by calling them 'retarded' instead of making solid points on the comments page.
- You are also making the point through your responses that Franceschini and Swale are right: this is about an upcoming tax increase just look at your quote Jack:

".....chose Mokena because it has the lowest tax rate compared to the other LW-feeder school towns. Which is why we need to keep our school quality up if we want our house values to be competitive to other areas. I don't think larger classroom sizes compared to other surrounding schools, outdated (12 yr old) textbooks put us on the map either. Add poor morale and lack of support from people like you and our town is not looking too optimal for young families."

If any statement is building momentum for a "tax increase" that is it. Why do you think enrollment is going down Jack, in this town and across the state? It's because of the taxes. Businesses cannot afford the high taxes in this state and they leave. So raising taxes will exacerbate the situation. So if you want young families, you need quality schools as you said and low taxes.

Young families I know avoided Mokena because of the taxes. They chose New Lenox instead.

Reply
Comment_arrow

A Mom Who Cares

1:53 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Aarvark, you need some clarification. First of all, don't include me in the name calling. I have not said the R word nor did I say that "old people' should move south (that was Jack) and I don't know who said people who are against tax increases are selfish and should be glad to pay more. Secondly, that was my quote and NOT Jack's. My quote was NOT AT ALL implying anything about any upcoming tax increase. I was actually saying that Mokena has the lowest tax rate in the surrounding areas contrary to what JDub was saying why people are leaving Mokena. School quality should be an important factor if we want to maintain house values or at least stay competitive. How you get school quality does NOT mean you have to increase taxes. The one does not imply the other.
The young families that you know that chose New Lenox were willing to pay alot more in taxes for a good school system. So, what is your point?

BookSavvy

1:34 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

The bottom line here is that 2 of the 7 people running for the (4) open positions on the school board have decided they want to throw 3 of the others under the bus. First, I truly find it hard to believe that if these 3 candidates were not inbetween them on the ballot, this would be happening. Second, I see plenty of room for the additional names. Finally, the mis-spelling was either done on purpose to avoid some sort of legal fall-back, or out of ignorance. One path to chose...which one, gentlemen? The fact is, this is a school board election. The same school board that is working to eliminate bulliying in our schools. Why are two potential members bullying other candidates? I would rather see literature about what a candidate will do for our school board. Instead, I see a flyer that panders to the voter about how they do not want to raise taxes! Gee, I think you are going to be pretty hard-pressed to find someone who says they want a tax hike. Maybe R-W Voter can work on this with all this free time on your hands. Swale and Franceschini need to stop placating the public with their buzz-phrases (LOWER TAXES!!! LOWER DEFICIT!!!) We all want these things. Lets put on our big-boy pants and work on real solutions, and less name calling. And as for R-Dub, I find your discussion of how things were "back when you went to school" irrelevant. Society changes and with that so does our education. How many computers did you work on in your private education?

Reply
Comment_arrow

A Mom Who Cares

1:59 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Well said BookSavvy!! However, those 2 people are actually throwing FOUR people under the bus. I am referring to the other current board member. What kind of message does it send that one current board member (who "rubberstamps" everything Pat Markham wants) is not pairing up with the other current board member? What about teamwork and respect? I thought they were both part of the "NEW" board. So, why are they not teamed up? Is it because one follows everything Patrick does and the other one thinks for himself??

Comment_arrow

Aardvark

3:07 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

So pointing out an opponent's past position on an issue affecting all voters is now considered bullying? What's next, pointing out that some have more relevant experience than others? So what solutions do you see BookSavvy when enrollment has declined 26% in 7 years, taxes taxes are up 33%, while real incomes in this state are down 3% since 2010? Pointing these facts out is a bullying tactic?

You talk about "big boy" "big girl pants." I ask you this: why was there a $2M deficit in 2011 that got turned around into a $100K surplus in 18 months? Perhaps the "old board" orchestrated by Perry was a rubber stamp and populated by people that accepted everything she said at face value? It seems the people who are wearing the big boy/girl pants are those that have the wherewithal to say no to something; instead of going along with the program for years.

In regard to solutions to problems: Why is it when the old board was in charge, 9 year old textbooks (now 12 according to Jack) were not a problem then but they are now? Maybe some solutions are things like ebooks, which have new info in them each year at less cost? How come the pros as Jack calls them, who he says should provide the budgets the board should pass, haven't jumped at ebooks? Maybe because they don't know or maybe because they haven't been pressured to know? Holding the professionals accountable is the board's job, not being all pleasant and saying "What do you want?" and then voting in favor without question.

Comment_arrow

R.W.Voter

3:18 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Two of the candidates have advocated for a referendum of more money from the taxpayers. That is in addition to the yearly levy that is requested. These are facts. I have learned that Mark and Bob have pledged to keep taxes low. That is what I want. I firmly believe that there is still a lot more waste that can be cut. I say that we find out how much per student it costs in our system and offer the parents vouchers to use at private institutions. What do you think? Thank you.

Comment_arrow

BookSavvy

4:35 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

I am merely saying the way the "ballot" was presented was very negative and therefore I think it is a bully tactic. Once again, I challenge you to find a resident of Mokena that really wants higher taxes. None of the other candidates have put any sort of literature out yet. I'd like to see what they all have to say. If I personally had solutions, I would readily give them, but I think it's incredibly small minded to assume that because a person supported a tax referendum, they have nothing more to bring to the table than higher taxes. Why is alright to say that 2 people who ardenly supported the referendum are useless on the board, but 2 people that are vehemently against it are the clear answer? I would hate to pay higher taxes-my family works hard for a living and we aren't looking to spend more. However, I'm also not in a postition to say that someone who supported the referendum is the enemy. Perhaps a person passionate enough to be willing to pay more on their tax bill will have the drive to come up with other solutions as well.

Mad at Dad

1:36 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Try again Aardvark. 2012 tax rate Mokena 7.2168 and New Lenox was 7.8874.

Reply

30 YEAR MOKENA RESIDENT

1:39 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Will there be teachers out in force destroyign campaign signs again because if i catch them on video like I did last election There will be someone prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law ,The group Cesta and Briscoe also have been caught red handed by property owners and sign people destroying and stealing signs my video cameras are up and running please attempt this again because it is now a felony in Illinois to destroy alter or take any signs or literature from authorized property!!!! Mark and Bob I need more signs now I have 6 empty lots on major roads you can place them on anytime !!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

A Mom Who Cares

2:01 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Too bad it is not a felony to put opponents' signs (signs that have paper covering Patrick Markham's old signs) on candidate's lawns (obviously without permission) as an intimidation tactic. I got the video as well!!! You know who you are.

Mad at Dad

1:47 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Well said BookSavvy. From the Patch articles about the online bullying, it was a parent that did all of the research and brought the program to the school board. Nice that Franceschini is taking all of the credit! 'Just a thought', he sure is finally showing Mokena who the bully is.

Reply

Thank you!

4:32 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Rw how are you such an authority on public schools when it appears you have never stepped foot in one? You could care less about the children in this community. It also appears that you have no idea that schools can no longer rely on Illinios to help fund them. They are 2 payments behind. The money needs to come from somewhere and I for one would be willing to pay higher taxes so our children get the education and technology they need to be successful in life and not sitting around complaining on a blog. Maybe a public school education would have opened your eyes as to how the real world works or maybe you should have gone into education and become a teacher if you think they have it so easy.

Reply

Frank H.

4:40 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

I find it extremely disgusting that the pro-tax referendum flyer that was circulated was endorsed by our township assessor, Krall. For a person that is a big part of establishing our already-high real estate taxes, he should keep his nose out of tax issues. How dare he take sides in this issue. Stick to your political games and leave the referendum to us.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mokena Citizen

5:54 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Frank H.- WHERE did you ever hear that Kral (only one L), our township assessor, supported the referendum???????? I certainly never heard or read anything of that nature. I bet if Mayor Werner were running, you would say he was for the referendum as well.

Thank you!

5:44 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

One more thing RW, have you noticed that bread is no longer .10 and milk is no longer a quarter? Yet people are still buying these things ( I know crazy right). Why are they still buying them you ask, because they are essentials to life... Just like a good education is essential... Guess what the price of a good education has to go up too! And I haven't seen a whole lot of employers looking for employees that have " good cursive writing." Wake up ... Times are a changing !

Reply

R.W.Voter

6:01 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

I realize that, but bread is not the same as it was . I feel that a good education is essential, but in most instances I do not feel that a child has the chance for one in the public schools. I equate it with the cost of cable tv. You get it but it really isn't worth what you are paying for it. Thank you

Reply

Thank you!

6:07 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Again I will ask you ... How do you know this if you haven't been a part of a public school? You are welcome!

Reply
Comment_arrow

R.W.Voter

6:35 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

I entered this before, but it didn't get there. as a child growing up in the city of Chicago, I played with public school students. Later in life, one told me "anybody can graduate from Bogan. Later I worked for the City. I dealt with public schools like Lane and Wells on the North side, Clemente on the West side and Bogan and Fenger on the south side. I have dealt with teachers strikes and riots at public schools. I see the kids that go to Mokena schools and St. Mary's . Believe me if I had children of school age, I would get a side job to send them to St. Mary's. My grandkids go to a suburban school, I wish they didn't. A friend has a child who went to school in Frankfort, failed english test 4 times, he graduated and then went to Lincolnway. I know too much. Glad my father did too. Thank you

Tired of Hacks

7:53 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

I have known one of the mis-spelled candidates for a LONG time. I find it exceedingly odd that the faux platform staes "more spending=deficit" in regards to a man who is a financial planner-his job for years has been to keep people OUT of deficit spending. Toss in the fact that this is for a SCHOOL BOARD and the thing is rife with falsehoods and mis-spelled words and I really question how qualified those who sent out that flyer are!!!!!

Reply

Marcia

12:20 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

I have lived in Mokena for 26 years. We moved here for the "blue ribbon" schools. District 159 is a shadow of what it once was. My children had a wonderful education there with caring teachers. I believe that anyone that is resorting to Chicago-type politics for school board positions, do not deserve these positions. Crony politics do not belong on our school board. Jim Andresen didn't have anything to do with the PAST referendum work. As far as I'm concerned, people that work as hard for our schools as Anna Briscoe does, deserves a chance to serve. The old referendum is a moot point-it's over and dead. I was appalled when I read something from the president of our school board that spelled "buses" wrong. Really? Swale and Franceschini are cut from the same cloth. I think the sign stealing remark is ludicrous! Young families do not want to buy in Mokena, because district 159 is not as good as it once was. It is sad, but hopefully this will be fixed with some new people on our school board. People that have, or will have children attending the schools, and care about their education.

Reply

R.W.Voter

8:10 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

The schools in general have declined due to the power of the Teachers union. They are the biggest drain on the system.But when you have pro referedum people trying to get on the board all you are going to get is higher taxes. The quality of the education will not get any better. Some teachers are not as good as others and as long as they have a union, you will never be able to get rid of them. The young eager to teach teachers getting out of school will not have a chance to do their thing unless the senior members retire. Thats it. Increased taxes will not improve the education, maybe just increase the employee's salaries and give more freebies. I will still vote for two, Swale and Mark. Thank you

Reply

Frank H.

10:34 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Hey Mokena citizen -It looks like you don't get around much or you are blind to the information out there concerning the referendum. I have seen the pro-referendum flyer with kral's face smack dab in it twice. Now if you are ignorant of that flyer, that's fine, but don't defend him if you are aware of the flyer. He's not worth it. He is not helping us with lowering our home's value because of the economy, but he is supporting a tax increase! What kind of public servant is that. Don't defend a politician that gets his marching orders from another politician. And let's make sure we don't ever pass a referendum that will raise our taxes. The current school board is doing a fine job with the finances and my children are doing fine with the education they are receiving and with the extra-curricular activities they are involved in. Let's keep our school board and get rid of the township politicians who are spending OUR money for their own good. They paid $1.5 million for a condo building and then put their political cronies in it. Talk about taking care of each other.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mokena Citizen

11:36 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

I would like to see this literature you are referring to. I was part of the group and there was NEVER any literature that we sent out with ANYONE's picture in it. Maybe it was the anti-referendum's flyer. The referendum is a moot point now - it is no longer even on the radar so I don't understand why it is even an issue. Also, I think you are using this forum to get you jabs at Kral. I don't really know him but I am tired of people flat out lying! Show me the literature- check who it is from. You can upload it just like Swale and Fran's brochure has been uploaded.

Dee Miller

12:32 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

48 comments on this article and only a hand full of them actually pertain to the contents of it. Every public election I have ever seen, no matter what it is for, candidates pick and choose points of why they should be elected over their opponents. All I see so far from this article, is two women, that want to make decisions for my children, whining about their names being spelled wrong on a brochure that they did not pay for. Should have just put Minnie Mouse, Daisy Duck, and Goofy on the made up ballot instead of giving them the exposure, because quite honestly, I didn't even know they were running until now.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jimshoe

1:31 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Bravo DEE Miller! It is almost as if supporters of the Two or Three candidates mentioned drag the discussion way off topic. (pres of board mispelled a word!!). OH MY.
Point IS: The Three Candidates a prone to advocate TAX INCREASES. However informing voters of their choices, as the ballot did, is a terrible thing! Did anyone notice the candidates mentioned say ANYTHING was NOT TRUE? So let the voters know you stood and stand for Tax Increases and Let the VOTERS decide who should represent them. Maybe the candidate’s supporters DRAG this WAY off TOPIC as You can fool some of the people all the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on. Swale and Franceschini are for living within the budget, the others have tried to increase the budget. (easy way out). It sure looks that way with the PRO REF activities and statements made.

Frank H.

5:13 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

If you are a Mokena resident, I'm surprised you didn't see the flyer talking about us needing to pay more taxes to save the extracurricular activities. And right there is kral's picture. And why shouldn't we be against that political hack. He's the one who increased my house's assessment, which means more taxes, and then he favors increasing taxes to save school activities on top of that. And going in to talk to him got us nowhere. Handed us a line of bs about our subdivision's value being under assessed, but yet my neighbors didn't go up, just me. So you go ahead and defend him...you must have gotten a nice reduction and will pay less taxes.

Reply

Leave a comment