President Obama has done a more than credible job of getting the country out of the worst recession and biggest fiscal mess since the Great Depression and deserves to be re-elected.
Obama took office when the country was losing 750,000 jobs a month, banks were not lending to anyone, the stock market was in turmoil and the international financial system was facing collapse. President Obama understood that we were not only in an economic emergency due to the housing crash, but that we were also facing fundamental long term economic challenges best illustrated by the shrinking of our middle class. He took steps to stop the economic freefall but also to address our long term economic problems.
President Obama showed leadership and political courage in restructuring General Motors and Chrysler Motors; he passed the stimulus package, thirty percent of which were tax cuts that reduced taxes for all Americans, with the remainder of the stimulus used to create over 3 million jobs through spending on infrastructure, aid to state and local governments and seeding the growth of the renewable energy industry. Obama Care was passed which will get 30 million people health insurance and reduce the budget deficit by over 100 billion dollars over the next 10 years.
Four years later instead of losing hundreds of thousands of jobs a month, we have seen a small but consistent growth in jobs for over twenty months, housing is coming back, consumer confidence is at a five year high and corporations have seen record profits with the stock market at a four year high. And this was accomplished despite historical obstructionism from Republicans whose only goal from the first day of the Obama Administration was to make Obama a one-term president.
President Obama’s success can be attributed to his core belief in the positive role that government should play in society. This belief is fundamentally different from how Republicans view government and is best illustrated in the parties stand on FEMA. George W. Bush hired a former horse show manager and the result was Katrina – remember “Hell of a job, Brownie.” Romney is on record saying FEMA should be sent to the states or even better privatized. In contrast, Obama hired the most qualified manager with disaster experience he could find – a Republican from Jeb Bush’s administration – because that is what good presidents who are non-ideological and believe in government do.
President Obama has shown leadership and political courage and deserves to be re-elected.
Willie C. Moore
Visit us at:
http://southsuburbanmoveoncouncil.weebly.com/index.html
bob ognar
1:07 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012
4 more days
AUSPICIOUS !
7:58 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Potus Obama, deserves 4 more years to complete his vision of change.
in 4 years no one can change decades of crooked ,greedy dysfunctional government.
he needs more time finish what he has started.
if mitt wins he will reep unmerited rewards, thin he will take us back to the very policies that got the USA in this mess.LIKE ALL THE OTHER REPUBLICANS
people dont be fooled by mitt romneyhe is a liar with a type A personality, coupled with sociopath and narcissistic disorder, willard mitt romney isnot mentally fit to run a country.
AUSPICIOUS !!!!!! PRESIDENT OBAMA
GO OUT AND VOTE FOR PRESIDENT OBAMA AND TAKE YOUR NEIGHBORS , AND YOUNG PEOPLE WITH YOU.
EVERY VOTE WILL COUNT IN THIS ELECTION
AUSPICIOUS !
8:15 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012
AUSPICIOUS !!!!
President Obama !!
MOKENA VOTER
2:37 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012
I'll respond after I watch Sean Hannity and he tells me what to think.
Robert
2:13 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012
LOL, sorry to say but that is what many people do. The middle class for the middle class vs the middle class for the ultra wealthy Those that support the wealthy don't even realize that is what they are actually doing. They are brainwashed into thinking that if they support the wealthy they will at least keep their job. Divide and conquer.
John Paul
3:36 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012
No one doubts that President Obama inherited a mess. having said that, lets not forget that the economic mess was the reason Americans turned to Obama four years ago. You can't blame the doctor when you get sick, but it is fair to blame the doctor wwhen you don't get better. I admit that there has been some marginal improvement in the economy, but that pales in comparison to the costs; the additional five trillion in debt.
Obama likes to blame those evil Republicans for his failures. Is that leadership? Both Reagan and Clinton had their best successes with the opposite party in power. Do you know why? It's because they were leaders. They didn't whine about their opposition, they appealed to the people who put pressure on their congressmen. The same can be said for Mitt Romney. He faced a legislature that was 87% Democratic. Eighty-seven per-cent. Democratic majorities in both houses.
Tim Pursell
4:36 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012
Perhaps the "leaders" you mention did not have to face the " historical obstructionism from Republicans". Maybe, just maybe the Democrats in those majorities were more willing to compromise for the greater good.
Our congress, over the past few years, has lost the respect of most of the country. You can't blame the President for their ineptitude.
AUSPICIOUS !
8:08 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Malarkey john paul
blame goes where it came from
President Obama has done very little if any complaining, he should have complained then people would say he whines and is weak.
He is far from Weak !!!!
Let this Brilliant man President Obama finsh what he has started
he isnot a magician 4 years isnot long enough to change the mess the USA has been headed for , for decades. everytime a republican wins he takes us back to the very policies that got the US in the mess it's in.
so JP go away with your lies, President Obama has never complained
but common sense tell you that 4 years isnot long enough to fix all the troubles he inherited. ( common sense isnot very common, apparently)
and yes republicans are against him from day one, Obama wanting to unite
and those nasty republican people want division, they had and have no plan to unite, and yes they have stood in Obama's way !!! God will get them straight !
Shame on them and shame on you John Paul !
AUSPICIOUS !
8:14 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012
jp
the 87 percent of democrats were looking to unite, not divide, so you are correct !
the proof is in the pudding, you just said it all, that is proof that democrats want to unite !
Republicans are evil and wants to maintain division, especially when it comes to this Black President Obama, I dare you to compare a governor to the President
that makes no good sense john paul but does show the truth,
so thank you for agreeing that Democrats want to unite and republicans want to maintain division and has faught president Obama on almost every issue, in an effort to maintain division.
Republicans are EVIL, you are right again JP
MS
1:38 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Mittens also had over 800 vetoes overturned by the democrats... that's a lot of vetoes and alot of over turning... not quite the consensus builder...
Stones
4:31 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012
John Paul, How much of the additional five trillion in debt can be attributed to the wars? Clearly we should have gone after al Queda in Afghanistan, but Iraq was a mistake. If you take Iraq out of the equation, maybe , just maybe we get out of Afghanistan much earlier. Saving how many trillions?
I'm no expert on the economy but I have read that when an economic downturn is tied with a bank failure, the recovery is much more difficult and takes quite a bit more time. I would also think that since so many manufacturing jobs have gone overseas, we don't have the job base we used to have in order help dig out of a recession.
Considering the mess he did start with, he's not doing as bad as some would like to think. Would I like to see better, yes, but things are turning upward. Slow growth may be better in the long run to avoid any of those "bubbles" that cause so much trouble when they burst.
Stephen B. Siefferman DDS
9:17 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012
I feel too much money has been spent inefficiently on failed enterprises that left the tax payer holding the bag. While stimulus sounded good, the money was squandered , doing no one any good , lining the pockets of some executives and politically connected ? The recovery (?) has not kept pace with population growth leaving college grads mired in debt and jobless. So what do we have to show for four years and 4+trillion dollars......not much . It's time for another change .
Tim Pursell
4:41 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012
"While stimulus sounded good, the money was squandered , doing no one any good , lining the pockets of some executives and politically connected ? "
Isn't this like the trickle down theory? Those that got their pockets lined should be investing and creating new jobs. Yea, right, like that is ever going to happen.
John Paul
11:33 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012
Remember, Obama just about ignored the economy and jobs for the first two years in office. Had he focused on jobs instead of Obamacare, he may have had something to show for it in 2010. That would have made it possible to keep his Democratic majorities in both houses. Unemployment would be down by now, and his re-election certain. he keeps blaming the tea party for his failures, but the tea party is actually the result of his failures. The GOP majority in the house didn't just happen; it was because voters were fed up.
Stuart Kurtz
9:07 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
Naturally, I see this a bit differently. Obama believed that the stimulus would be adequate to overcome the demand deficit that was a consequence of the housing-credit collapse. There were economists (e.g., Krugman) who argued that the planned stimulus was too small, and economists (e.g., Fama) who argued that any stimulus was ill advised. I'm not aware of any economist of note whose position on the stimulus changed based on actual outcomes, which is disappointing for what is ostensibly an evidence-based field.
As for ObamaCare, it was clear that rising healthcare costs threatened the underlying stability of the federal budget (and of private enterprise). Congress adopted a fairly comprehensive plan based on Republican ideas (ObamaCare really is just RomneyCare), but received only a single Republican vote along the way (Olympia Snowe's vote to break the filibuster). I expect that by 2016, the argument over ObamaCare will be mooted by its full implementation and the continuation of the current economic recovery. Fear mongering won't work once people have experienced the benefits.
AUSPICIOUS !
10:55 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012
john stop spreading lies, tell all details
Stephen B. Siefferman DDS
6:03 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012
Poor investing by the private sector does not cost the tax payers anything. Some of the stimulus cost the tax payers billions and leads to corruption to obtain that stimulus money through kick back contributions. The tax payer re usually the first to get their money when a company defaults, now we see loans being defaulted on by Solyndra and the tax payers getting nothing back. There is a huge difference
bob3
6:33 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012
Stephen "Poor investing by the private sector does not cost the tax payer"
You need to think about that. Tax ayers have to step in time and again b/c of poor investing
Mac Swimfan
7:29 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012
No the tax payer do HAVE To step in, but government want to all to often. If anti trust laws had been enforced maybe these companies would not have been to big to fail...companies need to reap the bad and the good alike so they don't do risky behavior in excess.
bob3
6:41 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012
Stephen (DDS)
For example AIG (insurer) made promises that it wold cover the losses of many banks. Well when these banks took on risky investments, it made AIG very unstable (the largest insurer int the world). If it had failed, lots of things woudl have failed.
When a private investors who promise to build a road don't do it properly, it costs the tax payers to rebuild it later on.
-------------
for all of you complaining about 4 T in debt. Our typical burn rate (even during the Bush years) is 1/T per year. So, Obama having blame fr that is unfair. And he had this when tax revenues are low due to bad economy.
The only only president in the last 35 years to actually cut the deficit was Clinton...and he had a good economy.
as for Solyndra....You have got to stop watching fox news. The government has a pretty decent track record for sponsoring companies engaged in risky ventures..sometimes they fail ..sometimes they lead to the space program. Solyndra cost 450 million...about $2/american. IT had the potential for bringing in many many jobs.
Kerry
9:01 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012
During the Clinton years the Republicans had control. Thats why the economy was good.
Mac Swimfan
9:19 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012
Clinton had good monetary policy....the congress watched the budget. Currently we have quantitative (inflation) easing and there has been no budget for four years... Obama is nothing like Clinton when policies are considered.
AUSPICIOUS !
10:57 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012
kerry deal with facts not lies
AUSPICIOUS !
10:58 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012
clinton is also white
Stephen B. Siefferman DDS
7:00 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012
As an example, if I borrow money to remodel the office, the bank examines my credit worthiness. I hire contractors they make money, their employees make money ,their suppliers make money, my patients like the nicer surroundings as do my employees and refer their friends, then I hire more employees, I pay back the bank.....we all pay taxes , everyone wins and the capital improvements are used. In Solyndra....the capital improvements were wasted, to parts sold off for a loss, no product or services are delivered, the employee are out of work , the loans were never paid back, no more tax revenues...everyone loses ....except for some well connected politician and executive who should have lost his investment ....that's why it is illegal for the Feds to subordinate an loan....but they broke the law because of the kick backs received.
vicky
1:51 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012
Obama appeared with Chris Christie for a convenient photo-op
while Bloomberg is now catching hell for dropping the ball on these poor storm victims. Bloomberg is taking the heat for our rock-star Prez.
The attack in Libya on 9-11 is so bungled by this administration & the media conveniently ignores this oh so important story to get Obama re-elected.
This inept, lying manipulative con artist might get elected again but America will truly see its darkest days yet. God help us all.
vicky
4:13 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012
One more thing to add. Just watched these poor Staten Island residents
saying the only help they're getting is from other volunteer residents. Stated
FEMA has failed them, it's all for show. Obama & Janet Napolitano flew in, flew out.
I'll give credit when credit is earned & Obama & FEMA at this point have abandoned these people.
Tom
1:57 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012
Some stats about the US government:
U.S. Tax revenue: $2,170,000,000,000
Fed budget: $3,820,000,000,000
New debt: $ 1,650,000,000,000
National debt: $14,271,000,000,000
Recent budget cuts: $ 38,500,000,000
Now, remove 8 zeroes and pretend it’s a household budget:
Annual family income: $21,700
Money the family spent: $38,200
New debt on the credit card: $16,500
Outstanding balance on the credit card: $142,710
Total budget cuts: $385
Tom
1:59 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012
Dumb ipad, couldnt scroll up!
The above posted breaks down the serious trouble the US is in. There is no turning back from this, only a default.
It happens to all empires.
James Neil
7:54 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012
I would like to see a article for reasons not to elect obama to a second term. It would probably take a full president term of time to write the article however.
The Guru
3:58 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Every vote for Obama kills a kitten.
The Guru
12:11 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012
You all just killed sooooo many kittens.